What is a case study analysis?
A case study presents an account of what happened in a particular situation. For our purposes, the cases all involve journalistic decision making. A case chronicles the events that reporters and editors have to deal with, such as what stories to cover and why, whether to violate someone’s privacy in the public’s interest, how to decide what constitutes conflict of interest, and many others.
Cases are valuable for several reasons. First, cases provide you with experience in journalistic problem solving that you may not have had the opportunity to experience firsthand. In a relatively short period of time, you will have the chance to appreciate and analyze the problems faced by many reporters and editors and to try to understand how to deal with them.
Second, cases illustrate what you have learned. The meaning and implication of this information are made clearer when they are applied to case studies. The theory and concepts help reveal what is going on in the situations studied and allow you to evaluate the solutions that you adopt to deal with the problems. It is important to remember, however, that no one knows for sure what the right answer is. All that anyone can do is to make the most informed decision. Using cases to see how theory can be put into practice is one way of improving your skills ethical decision makingskills you can then use when the real thing comes along.
Third, case studies provide you with the opportunity to participate in a process of decision making and to gain experience in presenting your ideas to others. This is how decisions are made in the actual world of journalism.
Analyzing a case study
As just mentioned, the purpose of the case study is to let you apply the concepts you've learned when you analyze the issues facing a specific journalistic situation. To analyze a case study, therefore, you must examine closely the issues with which your media outlet and those affected by your decision are confronted.
A detailed analysis of a case study should include the following seven areas:
- A definition of the ethical issue/problem.
- The immediate facts have the most bearing on the ethical decision you must render in this case, including any potential economic, social, or political pressures.
- A list of claimants in this issue and the way are you obligated to each of them.
- A list of at least 3 alternative courses of action.
- Consideration of the ethical approaches you have learned, asking whether they either support or reject any of your alternatives.
- Determination a course of action based on your analysis.
- Defense of your decision in the form of a letter addressed to your most adamant detractor.
A structured worksheet for analyzing the case studies can be found here along with detailed commentary on each step of the process.
d. Resolve to be more open, transparent and ethical. e. Make a decision now as to how you might handle such request should it arise. f. Explore ways to reduce such close scrutiny and control. IV.Courses of Action a. List, examine, and reevaluate your fact premises about people periodically to see if they need updating. Then create list of your value premises and share these with a colleague or friend to see if they withstand open scrutiny. b. Show your employees the list of assumptions that underlie Theory X and Theory Y. Then ask them for illustrations that indicate you are using either of the two paradigms. Invite them to help you make your actions more consistent with Theory Y. c. Examine the five models of OB every so often. Search for ways in which you could be using features from the more advanced models. d. Report the ways in which you have actively changed your